TL;DR
This paper evaluates federated learning for deep learning-based chest X-ray analysis, highlighting its impact on model performance, interpretability, and generalizability while preserving data privacy across multiple centers.
Contribution
It provides an empirical assessment of federated learning parameters and compares full image versus lung segmentation training approaches for chest X-ray classification.
Findings
Federated learning maintains model generalizability across centers.
Training on lung regions improves pathology interpretability.
Full images yield better classification performance.
Abstract
Federated learning enables building a shared model from multicentre data while storing the training data locally for privacy. In this paper, we present an evaluation (called CXR-FL) of deep learning-based models for chest X-ray image analysis using the federated learning method. We examine the impact of federated learning parameters on the performance of central models. Additionally, we show that classification models perform worse if trained on a region of interest reduced to segmentation of the lung compared to the full image. However, focusing training of the classification model on the lung area may result in improved pathology interpretability during inference. We also find that federated learning helps maintain model generalizability. The pre-trained weights and code are publicly available at (https://github.com/SanoScience/CXR-FL).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
