Discrepancy in Grain Size Estimation of H${}_{2}$O Ice in the Outer Solar System and the Interstellar Medium
A. Emran, V. F. Chevrier

TL;DR
This study compares radiative transfer models to estimate water ice grain sizes in the outer solar system, highlighting discrepancies and recommending the Mie model for accuracy and the Hapke slab model for practical use.
Contribution
It evaluates the accuracy of Hapke approximation models versus the Mie theory in estimating water ice grain sizes across different temperatures relevant to the outer solar system.
Findings
Hapke slab model closely matches Mie predictions for crystalline ice.
Hapke ISM shows higher uncertainty in grain size estimation.
Mie model is recommended for unknown spectra analysis.
Abstract
Widespread detection of amorphous and crystalline water (HO) ice in the outer solar system bodies and the interstellar medium has been confirmed over the past decades. Radiative transfer models (RTMs) are used to estimate the grain sizes of HO ice from near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths. Wide discrepancies in the estimation of HO ice grain size on the Saturnian moons (Hansen, 2009), as well as nitrogen (N) and methane (CH) ices on Kuiper belt objects have been reported owing to different scattering models used (Emran and Chevrier, 2022). We assess the discrepancy in the grain size estimation of HO ice at a temperature of 15, 40, 60, and 80 K (amorphous) and 20, 40, 60, and 80 K (crystalline) - relevant to the outer solar system and beyond. We compare the single scattering albedos of HO ice phases using the Mie theory (Mie, 1908) and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstro and Planetary Science · Atmospheric Ozone and Climate · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
