Dynamic super-resolution in particle tracking problems

TL;DR

This paper provides a rigorous mathematical analysis demonstrating the potential for super-resolution in dynamic particle tracking, allowing simultaneous recovery of source locations and velocities beyond traditional resolution limits.

Contribution

The paper introduces a theoretical framework for super-resolution in dynamic particle tracking, analyzing resolution limits and stability for reconstructing sources and velocities simultaneously.

Findings

Super-resolution is achievable when particles are separated beyond certain limits.

Velocity reconstruction has a better resolution limit that improves with particle motion.

Resolution depends on imaging system cutoff frequency, SNR, and source sparsity.

Abstract

Particle tracking in biological imaging is concerned with reconstructing the trajectories, locations, or velocities of the targeting particles. The standard approach of particle tracking consists of two steps: first reconstructing statically the source locations in each time step, and second applying tracking techniques to obtain the trajectories and velocities. In contrast, the dynamic reconstruction seeks to simultaneously recover the source locations and velocities from all frames, which enjoys certain advantages. In this paper, we provide a rigorous mathematical analysis for the resolution limit of reconstructing source number, locations, and velocities by general dynamical reconstruction in particle tracking problems, by which we demonstrate the possibility of achieving super-resolution for the dynamic reconstruction. We show that when the location-velocity pairs of the particles are separated beyond certain distances (the resolution limits), the number of particles and the location-velocity pair can be stably recovered. The resolution limits are related to the cut-off frequency of the imaging system, signal-to-noise ratio, and the sparsity of the source. By these estimates, we also derive a stability result for a sparsity-promoting dynamic reconstruction. In addition, we further show that the reconstruction of velocities has a better resolution limit which improves constantly as the particles moving. This result is derived by an observation that the inherent cut-off frequency for the velocity recovery can be viewed as the total observation time multiplies the cut-off frequency of the imaging system, which may lead to a better resolution limit as compared to the one for each diffraction-limited frame. It is anticipated that this observation can inspire new reconstruction algorithms that improve the resolution of particle tracking in practice.