Accounting for Misclassification in Multispecies Distribution Models
Kwaku Peprah Adjei, Robert Bob O'Hara, Anders G. Finstad, Wouter Koch

TL;DR
This paper introduces a flexible modeling framework that accounts for species misclassification in distribution data, improving accuracy and uncertainty estimates, especially relevant for citizen science biodiversity datasets.
Contribution
It presents a novel, adaptable model that corrects for misclassification errors in species distribution data and estimates associated uncertainties.
Findings
Model effectively corrects misclassification biases.
Accurately predicts true species distribution states.
Demonstrated on butterfly citizen science data.
Abstract
1. Species identification errors may have severe implications for the inference of species distributions. Accounting for misclassification in species distributions is an important topic of biodiversity research. With an increasing amount of biodiversity that comes from Citizen Science projects, where identification is not verified by preserved specimens, this issue is becoming more important. This has often been dealt with by accounting for false positives in species distribution models. However, the problem should account for misclassifications in general. 2. Here we present a flexible framework that accounts for misclassification in the distribution models and provides estimates of uncertainty around these estimates. The model was applied to data on viceroy, queen and monarch butterflies in the United States. The data were obtained from the iNaturalist database in the period 2019 to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpecies Distribution and Climate Change · Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
