Comparison of two multiplexed portable cold-atom vacuum standards
Lucas H. Ehinger, Bishnu P. Acharya, Daniel S. Barker, James A., Fedchak, Julia Scherschligt, Eite Tiesinga, Stephen Eckel

TL;DR
This study compares two portable cold-atom vacuum standards based on ultracold lithium atoms, demonstrating their agreement and identifying sources of outgassing to improve future measurements.
Contribution
It introduces a method for comparing quantum-based portable vacuum standards and assesses their accuracy and operational challenges.
Findings
The two pCAVS detected a leak of about 10^{-6} Pa L/s.
They measured a vacuum pressure of approximately 40 nPa with 2.6% uncertainty.
Operation causes additional outgassing that can be mitigated with better thermal management.
Abstract
We compare the vacuum measured by two portable cold-atom vacuum standards (pCAVS) based on ultracold Li atoms. The pCAVS are quantum-based standards that use a priori scattering calculations to convert a measured loss rate of cold atoms from a conservative trap into a background gas pressure. Our pCAVS devices share the same laser system and measure the vacuum concurrently. The two pCAVS together detected a leak with a rate on the order of Pa L/s. After fixing the leak, the pCAVS measured a pressure of about 40 nPa with 2.6 % uncertainty. The two pCAVS agree within their uncertainties, even when swapping some of their component parts. Operation of the pCAVS was found to cause some additional outgassing, on the order of Pa L/s, which can be mitigated in the future by better thermal management.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
