Calibration Strategy of the JUNO-TAO Experiment
Hangkun Xu, Angel Abusleme, Nikolay V. Anfimov, St\'ephane Callier,, Agustin Campeny, Guofu Cao, Jun Cao, Cedric Cerna, Yu Chen, Alexander, Chepurnov, Yayun Ding, Frederic Druillole, Andrea Fabbri, Zhengyong Fei,, Maxim Gromov, Miao He, Wei He, Yuanqiang He, Joseph yk Hor

TL;DR
This paper details the calibration methods and results for the JUNO-TAO neutrino detector, achieving high precision in energy response and stability essential for accurate antineutrino measurements.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive calibration strategy using multiple systems to control energy non-linearity and non-uniformity within tight tolerances.
Findings
Non-linear energy response controlled within 0.6%
Residual non-uniformity less than 0.2%
Energy bias and resolution degradation within 0.3% and 0.05%
Abstract
The Taishan Antineutrino Observatory (JUNO-TAO, or TAO) is a satellite detector for the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO). Located near the Taishan reactor, TAO independently measures the reactor's antineutrino energy spectrum with unprecedented energy resolution. To achieve this goal, energy response must be well calibrated. Using the Automated Calibration Unit (ACU) and the Cable Loop System (CLS) of TAO, multiple radioactive sources are deployed to various positions in the detector to perform a precise calibration of energy response. The non-linear energy response can be controlled within 0.6% with different energy points of these radioactive sources. It can be further improved by using decay signals produced by cosmic muons. Through the energy non-uniformity calibration, residual non-uniformity is less than 0.2%. The energy resolution degradation and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
