Implications of the Non-Observation of ${}^{6}{\rm Li}$ in Halo Stars for the Primordial ${}^{7}{\rm Li}$ Problem
Brian D. Fields, Keith A. Olive

TL;DR
This paper argues that the non-observation of ${}^{6}{ m Li}$ in halo stars suggests significant depletion of ${}^{6}{ m Li}$ and ${}^{7}{ m Li}$, providing an astrophysical solution to the primordial Lithium Problem.
Contribution
It demonstrates that ${}^{6}{ m Li}$ depletion levels imply sufficient ${}^{7}{ m Li}$ depletion to resolve the Lithium Problem, challenging previous assumptions of minimal stellar depletion.
Findings
${}^{6}{ m Li}$ upper limits are much lower than cosmic-ray predictions
Significant ${}^{6}{ m Li}$ depletion factors up to 50 are implied
Depletion of ${}^{7}{ m Li}$ can account for the observed abundance discrepancy
Abstract
The primordial Lithium Problem is intimately connected to the assumption that observed in metal-poor halo stars retains its primordial abundance, which lies significantly below the predictions of standard big-bang nucleosynthesis. Two key lines of evidence have argued that these stars have not significantly depleted their initial : i) the lack of dispersion in Li abundances measured at low metallicity; and ii) the detection of the more fragile isotope in at least two halo stars. The purported detections were in good agreement with predictions from cosmic-ray nucleosynthesis which is responsible for the origin of . This concordance left little room for depletion of depletion, and implied that the more robust largely evaded destruction. Recent (re)-observations of halo…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
