Snowmass2021 - White Paper, Implications of Energy Peak for Collider Phenomenology: Top Quark Mass Determination and Beyond

TL;DR

This paper reviews the energy-peak method for particle mass measurements, especially the top quark, highlighting its robustness against production uncertainties and proposing improvements to reduce systematic errors.

Contribution

It introduces a combined approach using B-hadron decay length and energy-peak techniques for more accurate, model-independent top quark mass determination.

Findings

Energy-peak location equals the parent's rest-frame energy.

B-hadron decay length correlates with bottom quark energy.

Proposed method reduces systematic uncertainties in top mass measurement.

Abstract

We first review the decade-old, broad collider physics research program dubbed energy-peaks. We consider the energy distribution of a massless particle in the lab frame arising from the two-body decay of a heavy particle produced unpolarized, whose boost distribution is arbitrary. Remarkably, the location of the peak of this child particle's energy distribution is identical to its single-valued energy in the rest frame of the parent, which is a function of the parent's mass and that of the other decay product. We summarize generalizations to other types of decay and a variety of applications to BSM. The energy-peak idea can also furnish a measurement of the top quark via the energy of the bottom quark from its decay, which, based on the "parent-boost-invariance," is less sensitive to details of the production mechanism of the top quark (cf.~most other methods assume purely SM production of the top quarks, hence are subject to uncertainties therein, including a possible BSM contribution). The original proposal along this line was to simply use the $b$-jet energy as a very good approximation to the bottom quark energy. This method has been successfully implemented by the CMS collaboration. However, the $b$-jet energy-peak method is afflicted by the jet-energy scale (JES) uncertainty. Fortunately, this drawback can be circumvented by using the decay length of a $B$-hadron contained in the $b$-jet as a proxy for the bottom quark energy. An interesting proposal is to then appropriately dovetail the above two ideas resulting in a "best of both worlds" determination of the top quark mass, i.e., based on a measurement of the $B$-hadron decay length, but improved by the energy-peak concept: this would be free of JES uncertainty and largely independent of the top quark production model. We summarize here the results of such an analysis which is to appear in a forthcoming paper.