There is no "Weil-"cohomology theory with real coefficients for arithmetic curves
Christopher Deninger

TL;DR
This paper explains why a Weil cohomology theory with real coefficients cannot exist for arithmetic schemes over Spec Z, extending Serre's argument from varieties over finite fields to arithmetic schemes.
Contribution
It provides a conceptual explanation for the non-existence of Weil cohomology theories with real coefficients for arithmetic schemes over Spec Z.
Findings
No Weil cohomology theory with real coefficients exists for arithmetic schemes over Spec Z.
Extends Serre's argument from varieties over finite fields to arithmetic schemes.
Clarifies limitations of cohomology theories in arithmetic geometry.
Abstract
A well known argument by Serre shows that there is no Weil cohomology theory with real coefficients for smooth projective varieties over . In this note we explain why no "Weil-"cohomology theory with real coefficients can exist for arithmetic schemes over spec , even for spectra of number rings.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Advanced Algebra and Geometry · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
