Comment on "Black Box Prediction Methods in Sports Medicine Deserve a Red Card for Reckless Practice: A Change of Tactics is Needed to Advance Athlete Care"
Jakim Berndsen, Derek McHugh

TL;DR
This paper critiques claims against black-box machine learning models in sports medicine, emphasizing the importance of transparency and highlighting ongoing research that addresses these concerns to improve athlete injury prediction.
Contribution
It provides a nuanced discussion on the limitations and advancements in transparent machine learning methods for sports injury prediction, countering overly negative views.
Findings
Transparency is crucial for ML in sports medicine
Research is actively addressing black-box limitations
Ongoing developments improve injury risk prediction models
Abstract
In this paper we examine the claims made by Bullock et. al. on the applicability of black-box injury risk approaches in the sports injury domain. Overall, we agree that transparency is necessary for Machine Learning models to be useful in this field. However, there are areas of research that address precisely the concerns of the authors and strongly temper their conclusions. In the following we look at how these issues are being tackled by the Machine Learning community.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
