
TL;DR
This paper explores the evolution of four-dimensional space-time geometry since Einstein, questioning the notion that space-time is fundamentally doomed due to quantum gravity challenges.
Contribution
It offers a historical and conceptual analysis of space-time geometry's development and discusses alternative ideas that may preserve its relevance.
Findings
Space-time geometry has evolved significantly since Einstein.
New ideas suggest space-time may not be fundamentally doomed.
Theoretical developments challenge the notion of space-time's demise.
Abstract
For many years now it has become conventional for theorists to argue that "space-time is doomed", with the difficulties in finding a quantum theory of gravity implying the necessity of basing a fundamental theory on something quite different than usual notions of space-time geometry. But what is this space-time geometry that is doomed? In this essay we'll explore how our understanding of four-dimensional geometry has evolved since Einstein, leading to new ideas about such geometry which may not be doomed at all.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
