Surrogate model for gravitational wave signals from non-spinning, comparable- to large-mass-ratio black hole binaries built on black hole perturbation theory waveforms calibrated to numerical relativity
Tousif Islam, Scott E. Field, Scott A. Hughes, Gaurav Khanna, Vijay, Varma, Matthew Giesler, Mark A. Scheel, Lawrence E. Kidder, Harald P., Pfeiffer

TL;DR
This paper introduces a surrogate model for gravitational waveforms from non-spinning black hole binaries with a wide range of mass ratios, calibrated to numerical relativity data, enhancing waveform accuracy and coverage.
Contribution
The authors develop HPTNRSur1dq1e4, a new surrogate model trained on perturbation theory waveforms, extended to include more modes and calibrated to NR data, covering mass ratios from 2.5 to 10,000.
Findings
Waveforms agree with NR data within 10^{-3} for dominant modes.
Model covers longer durations up to 30,500 m_1.
Includes multiple spherical harmonic modes up to ll=10.
Abstract
We present a reduced-order surrogate model of gravitational waveforms from non-spinning binary black hole systems with comparable to large mass-ratio configurations. This surrogate model, \texttt{BHPTNRSur1dq1e4}, is trained on waveform data generated by point-particle black hole perturbation theory (ppBHPT) with mass ratios varying from 2.5 to 10,000. \texttt{BHPTNRSur1dq1e4} extends an earlier waveform model, \texttt{EMRISur1dq1e4}, by using an updated transition-to-plunge model, covering longer durations up to 30,500 (where is the mass of the primary black hole), includes several more spherical harmonic modes up to , and calibrates subdominant modes to numerical relativity (NR) data. In the comparable mass-ratio regime, including mass ratios as low as , the gravitational waveforms generated through ppBHPT agree surprisingly well with those from NR after this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
