Discussions on the nature of GLEAM-X J162759.5-523504.3
H. Tong

TL;DR
This paper explores the nature of GLEAM-X J162759.5-523504.3, proposing it as a radio-loud magnetar with a fallback disk, and discusses its emission, pulsation, and evolutionary constraints within neutron star models.
Contribution
It offers a neutron star-based explanation for GLEAM-X J1627, including modifications to the pulsar death line and analytical constraints on magnetic field and disk mass.
Findings
GLEAM-X J1627 may be a radio-loud magnetar with a fallback disk.
The pulsar death line is modified by fallback disk or twisted magnetic field.
Constraints on magnetic field strength and initial disk mass are derived.
Abstract
The nature of the long period radio transient GLEAM-X J162759.5523504.3 (GLEAM-X J1627 for short) is discussed. We try to understand both its radio emission and pulsation in the neutron star scenario, as an alternative to the white dwarf model. We think that: (1) From the radio emission point of view, GLEAM-X J1627 can be a radio-loud magnetar. (2) From the rotational evolution point of view, GLEAM-X J1627 is unlikely to be an isolated magnetar. (3) The 1091s period is unlikely to be the precession period. (4) GLEAM-X J1627 may be a radio-loud magnetar spin-down by a fallback disk. (5) The pulsar death line is modified due to the presence of a fallback disk or a twisted magnetic field. In both cases, a higher maximum acceleration potential can be obtained. This may explain why GLEAM-X J1627 is still radio active with such a long pulsation period. (6) General constraint on the neutron…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research · Geophysics and Sensor Technology · High-pressure geophysics and materials
