Structural parameters and possible association of the Ultra-Faint Dwarfs Pegasus III and Pisces II from deep Hubble Space Telescope photometry
Hannah Richstein, Ekta Patel, Nitya Kallivayalil, Joshua D. Simon,, Paul Zivick, Erik Tollerud, Tobias Fritz, Jack T. Warfield, Gurtina Besla,, Roeland P. van der Marel, Andrew Wetzel, Yumi Choi, Alis Deason, Marla Geha,, Puragra Guhathakurta, Myoungwon Jeon, Evan N. Kirby

TL;DR
This study uses deep HST photometry and Gaia data to analyze the structure, luminosity, and orbital history of the ultra-faint dwarf galaxies Pegasus III and Pisces II, exploring their possible past association.
Contribution
It provides detailed structural parameters, assesses their orbital histories considering the LMC's influence, and discusses the potential past interaction between these two distant satellites.
Findings
Peg III has an elliptical half-light radius of 118 pc and M_V = -4.17.
Psc II has a half-light radius of 69 pc and M_V = -4.28.
Possible past close passage (~10-20 kpc) between Peg III and Psc II about 1 Gyr ago.
Abstract
We present deep Hubble Space Telescope (HST) photometry of the ultra-faint dwarf (UFD) galaxies Pegasus III (Peg III) and Pisces II (Psc II), two of the most distant satellites in the halo of the Milky Way (MW). We measure the structure of both galaxies, derive mass-to-light ratios with newly determined absolute magnitudes, and compare our findings to expectations from UFD-mass simulations. For Peg III, we find an elliptical half-light radius of arcminutes ( pc) and ; for Psc II, we measure arcminutes ( pc) and . We do not find any morphological features that indicate a significant interaction between the two has occurred, despite their close separation of only 40 kpc. Using proper motions (PMs) from Gaia early Data Release 3, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
