Feasibility of nowcasting SDG indicators: a comprehensive survey
Daniel Hopp, Emily Fu, Anu Peltola

TL;DR
This paper assesses the feasibility of nowcasting SDG indicators to provide more timely progress estimates, through a comprehensive survey and a case study on indicator 9.4.1, highlighting potential and limitations.
Contribution
It conducts the first comprehensive feasibility survey of all SDG indicators for nowcasting and demonstrates the process with a detailed case study.
Findings
150 indicators are highly suitable for nowcasting
87 indicators are likely suitable for nowcasting
125 indicators are unsuitable for nowcasting
Abstract
The 2030 Agenda and accompanying Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are vital in guiding national and global policy. However, many of the SDG indicators used to measure progress toward those goals suffer from long publication lags. Nowcasting has the potential to address this problem and generate more timely estimates of those indicators. This paper provides resources for achieving that potential by 1) carrying out a comprehensive nowcasting feasibility survey of all SDG indicators to assess their potential to be nowcast, and 2) performing a case study of indicator 9.4.1 to illustrate and shed light on the process of performing a nowcasting exercise. There exist 231 SDG indicators, but due to only examining Tier 1 indicators and the fact that many indicators have multiple sub-indicators, 362 indicators and sub-indicators were eventually surveyed. Of those 362, 150 were found highly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
