Optimal Workplace Occupancy Strategies during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Mansoor Davoodi, Abhishek Senapati, Adam Mertel, Weronika, Schlechte-Welnicz, Justin M. Calabrese

TL;DR
This paper develops a bi-objective optimization model to balance COVID-19 infection risk and productivity in workplaces, providing a practical framework and an online tool for organizations to determine optimal occupancy strategies.
Contribution
It introduces a novel probabilistic framework and optimization approach to identify Pareto optimal workplace occupancy strategies during the pandemic.
Findings
The model accurately estimates infection risk based on key parameters.
Numerical experiments demonstrate effective trade-offs between safety and productivity.
An online application helps organizations implement optimal occupancy strategies.
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many organizations (e.g. businesses, companies, government facilities, etc.) have attempted to reduce infection risk by employing partial home office strategies. However, working from home can also reduce productivity for certain types of work and particular employees. Over the long term, many organizations therefore face a need to balance infection risk against productivity. Motivated by this trade-off, we model this situation as a bi-objective optimization problem and propose a practical approach to find trade-off (Pareto optimal) solutions. We present a new probabilistic framework to compute the expected number of infected employees as a function of key parameters including: the incidence level in the neighborhood of the organization, the COVID-19 transmission rate, the number of employees, the percentage of vaccinated employees, the testing frequency,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
