How Can We Develop Explainable Systems? Insights from a Literature Review and an Interview Study
Larissa Chazette, Jil Kl\"under, Merve Balci, Kurt Schneider

TL;DR
This paper identifies six core activities and practices for developing explainable systems, combining literature review and industry interviews to provide practical guidance for integrating explainability into software development.
Contribution
It introduces a set of six core activities and practices for explainable system development, validated through literature and industry expert insights.
Findings
Activities and practices are feasible for industry adoption.
The proposed activities can be integrated into various development processes.
Industry professionals recommend specific practices for explainability.
Abstract
Quality aspects such as ethics, fairness, and transparency have been proven to be essential for trustworthy software systems. Explainability has been identified not only as a means to achieve all these three aspects in systems, but also as a way to foster users' sentiments of trust. Despite this, research has only marginally focused on the activities and practices to develop explainable systems. To close this gap, we recommend six core activities and associated practices for the development of explainable systems based on the results of a literature review and an interview study. First, we identified and summarized activities and corresponding practices in the literature. To complement these findings, we conducted interviews with 19 industry professionals who provided recommendations for the development process of explainable systems and reviewed the activities and practices based on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
