Complexity and entanglement in non-local computation and holography
Alex May

TL;DR
This paper explores how gravity, via the AdS/CFT correspondence, constrains the complexity of non-local computations by relating it to entanglement and the geometry of bulk regions, specifically the ridge surface.
Contribution
It establishes a relationship between the complexity of local operations and the entanglement cost for their non-local implementation in holographic theories.
Findings
Complexity and entanglement cost are polynomially related.
Gravity constrains the complexity of operations to be polynomial in the ridge area.
Non-local computation in holography is governed by entanglement and geometric surfaces.
Abstract
Does gravity constrain computation? We study this question using the AdS/CFT correspondence, where computation in the presence of gravity can be related to non-gravitational physics in the boundary theory. In AdS/CFT, computations which happen locally in the bulk are implemented in a particular non-local form in the boundary, which in general requires distributed entanglement. In more detail, we recall that for a large class of bulk subregions the area of a surface called the ridge is equal to the mutual information available in the boundary to perform the computation non-locally. We then argue the complexity of the local operation controls the amount of entanglement needed to implement it non-locally, and in particular complexity and entanglement cost are related by a polynomial. If this relationship holds, gravity constrains the complexity of operations within these regions to be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
