Compressible Velocity Transformations for Various Noncanonical Wall-Bounded Turbulent Flows

TL;DR

This study evaluates various velocity transformations for non-canonical compressible wall-bounded turbulent flows, revealing their limitations and the need for more sophisticated models to achieve universal applicability.

Contribution

It systematically assesses popular velocity transformations across diverse non-canonical flows, highlighting their performance and limitations in different flow regimes.

Findings

Trettel-Larsson transformation works for high-enthalpy temporal boundary layers

Transformations perform well in viscous sublayer across flows

None of the transformations work universally for all non-canonical flows

Abstract

This work assesses several popular transformations for the velocity profile through their application to several types of non-canonical compressible wall-bounded turbulent flows. Specifically, this work explores DNS databases of high-enthalpy boundary layers with dissociation and vibrational excitation, supercritical channel and boundary-layer flows, and adiabatic boundary layers with pressure gradients. The transformations considered include the van Driest [Van Driest, J. Aeronaut. Sci., 18(1951):145-216], Zhang et al. [Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 109(2012):054502], Trettel-Larsson [Trettel and Larsson, Phys. Fluids, 28(2016):026102], data-driven [Volpiani et al., Phys. Rev. Fluids, 5(2020):052602], and total-stress-based [Griffin et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 118(2021):e2111144118] transformations. The Trettel-Larsson transformation collapses velocity profiles of high-enthalpy temporal boundary layers but not the spatial boundary layers considered. For supercritical channel flows, the Trettel-Larsson transformation also performs well over the entire inner layer. None of the transformations above works for supercritical boundary layers. For all the considered methods, the transformed velocity profiles of boundary layers with weak pressure gradients coincide well with the universal incompressible law of the wall. In summary, all these popular methods fail to deliver uniform performance for non-canonical compressible wall-bounded flows in the logarithmic region, and a more sophisticated version, which accounts for these different physics, is needed. The data-driven and total-stress-based transformations perform well in the viscous sublayer for all the considered flows.