Comment on "First-order methods almost always avoid strict saddle points"
Jinyang Zheng, Yong Xia

TL;DR
This paper corrects the analysis of Riemannian gradient descent's stability in manifold optimization, providing an explicit step-size bound based on a new retraction L-smooth property, ensuring avoidance of strict saddle points.
Contribution
It corrects previous analysis and introduces a retraction L-smooth property to explicitly bound step-size in Riemannian gradient descent.
Findings
Corrected the stability analysis of Riemannian gradient descent.
Established an explicit step-size bound using retraction L-smoothness.
Ensured avoidance of strict saddle points for almost all initializations.
Abstract
The analysis on the global stability of Riemannian gradient descent method in manifold optimization (i.e., it avoids strict saddle points for almost all initializations) due to Lee et al. (Math. Program. 176:311-337) is corrected. Moreover, an explicit bound on the step-size is presented by the newly introduced retraction L-smooth property.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Optimization Algorithms Research · Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques · Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations
