Atmosphere Loss in Oblique Super-Earth Impacts
Thomas R. Denman, Zoe M. Leinhardt, Philip J. Carter

TL;DR
This study models giant impacts on Super-Earths to understand atmosphere loss, revealing that complete atmosphere removal is unlikely in single collisions and depends on impact angle and energy.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed simulation-based analysis of atmosphere loss in oblique super-Earth impacts, highlighting the impact angle's role in atmosphere retention.
Findings
Head-on impacts can remove atmospheres but require catastrophic energy levels.
Most collisions, especially oblique ones, are less efficient at removing atmospheres.
Complete atmosphere removal in a single impact is unlikely during planet formation.
Abstract
Using smoothed particle hydrodynamics we model giant impacts of Super-Earth mass rocky planets between an atmosphere-less projectile and an atmosphere-rich target. In this work we present results from head-on to grazing collisions. The results of the simulations fall into two broad categories: 1) one main post-collision remnant containing material from target and projectile; 2) two main post-collision remnants resulting from `erosive hit-and-run' collisions. All collisions removed at least some of the target atmosphere, in contrast to the idealised hit-and-run definition in which the target mass is unchanged. We find that the boundary between `hit-and-run' collisions and collisions that result in the projectile and target accreting/merging to be strongly correlated with the mutual escape velocity at the predicted point of closest approach. Our work shows that it is very unlikely for a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
