A generalization of falsity in finitely-many valued logics
Nissim Francez

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel negation concept in multi-valued logics, offering a new perspective on truth and falsity definitions in many-valued logical systems.
Contribution
It proposes a new type of negation and a general framework for defining truth and falsity in arbitrary finitely-valued logics.
Findings
New negation concept for multi-valued logics
Generalized definitions of truth and falsity
Enhanced understanding of logical negation in many-valued systems
Abstract
The paper proposes a new type of negation in multi-valued logics, providing a different way to answer the following question: what does it mean that some object language formula does not have a given truth-value. Along the way, the paper provides a general definition of truth and falsity in an arbitrary many-valued logic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Logic · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
