How to Report and Benchmark Emerging Field-Effect Transistors
Zhihui Cheng, Chin-Sheng Pang, Peiqi Wang, Son T. Le, Yanqing Wu,, Davood Shahrjerdi, Iuliana Radu, Max C. Lemme, Lian-Mao Peng, Xiangfeng Duan,, Zhihong Chen, Joerg Appenzeller, Steven J. Koester, Eric Pop, Aaron D., Franklin, Curt A. Richter

TL;DR
This paper establishes consensus guidelines for reporting and benchmarking key parameters of emerging low-dimensional FETs, aiming to standardize assessments and facilitate consistent progress in the field.
Contribution
It provides a set of standardized reporting and benchmarking guidelines for 2D semiconductor FETs, addressing current inconsistencies in the emerging field.
Findings
Consensus guidelines for FET reporting established
Example application to 2D semiconductor FETs provided
Improved comparability and assessment of device performance
Abstract
Emerging low-dimensional nanomaterials have been studied for decades in device applications as field-effect transistors (FETs). However, properly reporting and comparing device performance has been challenging due to the involvement and interlinking of multiple device parameters. More importantly, the interdisciplinarity of this research community results in a lack of consistent reporting and benchmarking guidelines. Here we report a consensus among the authors regarding guidelines for reporting and benchmarking important FET parameters and performance metrics. We provide an example of this reporting and benchmarking process for a two-dimensional (2D) semiconductor FET. Our consensus will help promote an improved approach for assessing device performance in emerging FETs, thus aiding the field to progress more consistently and meaningfully.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
