TL;DR
This study examines the ionisation states in nebular-phase Type Ia supernovae spectra, testing models against observations and exploring how non-thermal energy deposition affects ionisation predictions.
Contribution
It introduces a method to determine excitation conditions from [Fe II] line ratios and evaluates different treatments of non-thermal energy deposition to improve model-observation agreement.
Findings
Simple work function approximation aligns better with data than detailed Spencer-Fano treatment.
Significant additional heating, up to eight times the current energy loss rate, is needed to match observations.
Line ratios alone cannot reliably distinguish between different explosion scenarios.
Abstract
The nebular spectra of Type Ia supernovae ( 100 days after explosion) consist mainly of emission lines from singly- and doubly-ionised Fe-group nuclei. However, theoretical models for many scenarios predict that non-thermal ionisation leads to multiply-ionised species whose recombination photons ionise and deplete Fe , resulting in negligible [Fe II] emission. We investigate a method to determine the collisional excitation conditions from [Fe II] line ratios independently from the ionisation state and find that it cannot be applied to highly-ionised models due to the influence of recombination cascades on Fe level populations. When the ionisation state is artificially lowered, the line ratios (and excitation conditions) are too similar to distinguish between explosion scenarios. We investigate changes to the treatment of non-thermal energy deposition as a way to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
