Core and stability notions in many-to-one matching markets with indifferences
Agust\'in G. Bonifacio, Noelia Juarez, Pablo Neme, Jorge Oviedo

TL;DR
This paper explores core and stability concepts in many-to-one matching markets with indifferences, establishing relationships among various core and stability notions and their connections to tie-breaking models.
Contribution
It introduces and compares multiple core and stability notions in markets with indifferences, clarifying their relationships and links to strict market models.
Findings
Core contains the stable set.
Strong core equals strongly stable set.
Super core equals super stable set.
Abstract
In a many-to-one matchingmodel with responsive preferences in which indifferences are allowed, we study three notions of core, three notions of stability, and their relationships. We show that (i) the core contains the stable set, (ii) the strong core coincides with the strongly stable set, and (iii) the super core coincides with the super stable set. We also show how the core and the strong core in markets with indifferences relate to the stable matchings of their associated tie-breaking strict markets.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Auction Theory and Applications · Game Theory and Applications
