Can we estimate the intensities of great geomagnetic storms($\Delta$SYM-H$\le -$200 nT) by Burton equation or by O'Brien and McPherron equation?
Ming-Xian Zhao, Gui-Ming Le, Jianyong Lu

TL;DR
This study evaluates the effectiveness of Burton and O'Brien-McPherron equations in estimating the intensities of great geomagnetic storms, finding significant inaccuracies and highlighting the importance of solar wind dynamic pressure.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that Burton and OM equations are ineffective for GGS intensity estimation and emphasizes the role of solar wind dynamic pressure, proposing a more accurate empirical approach.
Findings
OM equation significantly underestimates storm intensities.
RMS error for OM equation is 203 nT, indicating large deviations.
Burton equation has an RMS error of 130.8 nT, with larger errors for intense storms.
Abstract
We input solar wind parameters responsible for the main phases of 15 great geomagnetic storms (GGSs: SYM-H200 nT) into the empirical formulae created by \cite{Burton1975}(hereafter Burton equation), and by \cite{OBrien2000}(hereafter OM equation) to evaluate whether \textbf{two equations} can correctly estimate the intensities of GGSs. The results show that the intensities of most GGSs estimated by OM equation are much smaller than the observed intensities. The RMS error between the intensities estimated by OM equation and the observed intensities is \textbf{203} nT, implying that the estimated storm intensity deviates significantly from the observed one. The RMS error between the intensities estimated by Burton equation and the observed intensities is 130.8 nT. The relative error caused by Burton equation for the storms with intensities SYM-H-400 nT is larger…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
