Quantifying Demonstration Quality for Robot Learning and Generalization

TL;DR

This paper introduces a method to quantify demonstration quality in robot learning from user-provided demonstrations by assessing task performance, which correlates strongly with the robot's generalization ability and user adaptation levels.

Contribution

It proposes a novel approach to evaluate demonstration quality based on task performance, validated through a user study with diverse expertise levels.

Findings

Strong correlation (R=0.85) between demonstration quality and generalization performance.

Users cluster into high-quality and improving groups based on demonstration quality.

Quantifying demonstration quality reveals user adaptation and expertise levels.

Abstract

Learning from Demonstration (LfD) seeks to democratize robotics by enabling diverse end-users to teach robots to perform a task by providing demonstrations. However, most LfD techniques assume users provide optimal demonstrations. This is not always the case in real applications where users are likely to provide demonstrations of varying quality, that may change with expertise and other factors. Demonstration quality plays a crucial role in robot learning and generalization. Hence, it is important to quantify the quality of the provided demonstrations before using them for robot learning. In this paper, we propose quantifying the quality of the demonstrations based on how well they perform in the learned task. We hypothesize that task performance can give an indication of the generalization performance on similar tasks. The proposed approach is validated in a user study (N = 27). Users with different robotics expertise levels were recruited to teach a PR2 robot a generic task (pressing a button) under different task constraints. They taught the robot in two sessions on two different days to capture their teaching behaviour across sessions. The task performance was utilized to classify the provided demonstrations into high-quality and low-quality sets. The results show a significant Pearson correlation coefficient (R = 0.85, p < 0.0001) between the task performance and generalization performance across all participants. We also found that users clustered into two groups: Users who provided high-quality demonstrations from the first session, assigned to the fast-adapters group, and users who provided low-quality demonstrations in the first session and then improved with practice, assigned to the slow-adapters group. These results highlight the importance of quantifying demonstration quality, which can be indicative of the adaptation level of the user to the task.