Are Quantum-Classical Hybrids compatible with Ontological Cellular Automata?
Hans-Thomas Elze

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether quantum-classical hybrids can be modeled within the Cellular Automaton Interpretation of quantum mechanics, finding that such hybrids generally cannot be consistently maintained under interactions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that quantum-classical hybrids are incompatible with the CAI framework due to the disruptive effects of an identified error mechanism.
Findings
Hybrid models lose consistency under interactions.
Classical chains can become quantum-like due to error mechanisms.
Quantum-classical hybrids cannot be fundamental in CAI.
Abstract
Based on the concept of ontological states and their dynamical evolution by permutations, as assumed in the Cellular Automaton Interpretation (CAI) of quantum mechanics, we address the issue whether quantum-classical hybrids can be described consistently in this framework. We consider chains of 'classical' two-state Ising spins and their discrete deterministic dynamics as an ontological model with an unitary evolution operator generated by pair exchange interactions. A simple error mechanism is identified, which turns them into quantum mechanical objects, chains of qubits. Consequently, an interaction between a quantum mechanical and a 'classical' chain can be introduced and its consequences for this quantum-classical hybrid be studied. We find that such hybrid character of composites, generally, does not persist under interactions and, therefore, cannot be upheld consistently, or even…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
