TL;DR
This study assesses the detectability of the Kepler-1708 b-i exomoon candidate with HST, finding it likely undetectable due to noise and systematics, but potentially recoverable with JWST's NIRSpec mode.
Contribution
The paper provides a detailed simulation-based analysis of the exomoon's detectability with HST, highlighting limitations and future prospects with JWST.
Findings
Only 10% true-positive probability with HST data.
Instrumental systematics hinder detection despite HST's larger aperture.
JWST's NIRSpec mode could reliably detect the exomoon.
Abstract
The exomoon candidate Kepler-1708 b-i was recently reported using two transits of Kepler data. Supported by a 1% false-positive probability, the candidate is promising but requires follow-up observations to confirm/reject its validity. In this paper, we consider the detectability of the exomoon candidate's transit, most specifically in the next window (March 2023) using the WFC3 instrument aboard the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). Using realistic noise estimates, accounting for the visit-long trends, and propagating the model posteriors derived using the Kepler data, we perform 75 injection-recovery trials with Bayesian model selection. Defining a successful detection as one which meets thresholds of the Bayes factor, AIC, and error of the retrieved parameters, only 7 of our 75 injections were recovered when considering HST data alone. This implies a true-positive probability (TPP) of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
