Impact of event activity variable on the ratio of observables in isobar collisions

TL;DR

This study investigates how the choice of event activity variable affects observable ratios in isobar collisions, revealing that using multiplicity $N_{ch}$ provides more stable baselines and better controls nonflow effects than centrality.

Contribution

It quantifies the impact of event activity variable choice on observable ratios in isobar collisions using experimental data and AMPT model simulations, highlighting the advantages of using $N_{ch}$ over centrality.

Findings

Ratios $R_{v_n}(N_{ch})$ are nearly independent of analysis approach.

Ratios sensitive to CME are closer to unity when using $N_{ch}$.

The surface diffuseness parameter $a_0$ significantly influences $ riangle R$.

Abstract

The STAR isobar data of $^{96}$Ru+$^{96}$Ru and $^{96}$Zr+$^{96}$Zr collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}= 200$ GeV show that ratios of observables ($R_{\mathcal{O}}$) such as the multiplicity distribution, $p(N_{\mathrm{ch}})$, and the harmonic flow, $v_n$, deviate from unity, when presented as a function of centrality, $c$. These deviations have been attributed to the differences in the shape and radial profiles between $^{96}$Ru and $^{96}$Zr nuclei. In addition, the ratios $R_{\mathcal{O}}(x)$ depend on the choice of the event activity variable $x$, which could be either $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ or centrality. We estimate the difference $\Delta R$ between these two choices, based on the published $p(N_{\mathrm{ch}})$, as well as those from a multiphase transport (AMPT) model with varied nuclear structure parameters: nuclear radius ($R_0$), surface diffuseness ($a_0$), quadrupole deformation ($\beta_2$), and octupole deformation ($\beta_3$). In contrary to $R_{v_n}(c)$, $R_{v_n}(N_{\mathrm{ch}})$ is nearly independent of the analysis approaches, suggesting that nonflow effects are better controlled by $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ than $c$. The ratios of observables sensitive to the chiral magnetic effect (CME) are also much closer to unity for $x=N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ than $x=c$, indicating that the ratios calculated at the same $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ provide a better baseline for the non-CME background. According to the AMPT results, the dominant parameter for $\Delta R$ is $a_0$, while $R_0$ and $\beta_n$ are only important in central collisions. The published $p(N_{\mathrm{ch}})$ is also used to estimate $\Delta R_{\left\langle p_{\mathrm{T}}\right\rangle}$ for mean transverse momentum, which is non-negligible compared with $R_{\left\langle p_{\mathrm{T}}\right\rangle}-1$.