DSRC & C-V2X Comparison for Connected and Automated Vehicles in Different Traffic Scenarios
Yuanzhe Jin, Xiangguo Liu, Qi Zhu

TL;DR
This paper compares C-V2X and DSRC communication protocols for connected and automated vehicles across various traffic scenarios, highlighting trade-offs and guiding protocol selection for improved CAV performance.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of C-V2X and DSRC in different traffic scenarios, aiding in protocol choice for CAV applications.
Findings
Trade-off identified between communication range and interval for both protocols.
C-V2X and DSRC perform differently depending on traffic scenario.
Results support adaptive protocol selection for CAVs.
Abstract
Researches have been devoted to making connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) faster in different traffic scenarios. By using C-V2X or DSRC communication protocol, CAVs can work more effectively. In this paper, we compare these two communication protocols on CAVs in three different traffic scenarios including ramp merging, intersection, and platoon brake. It shows there is a trade-off between communication range and interval when leveraging C-V2X or DSRC for CAVs. The result can help support further application designs for CAV autonomously choosing communication protocols in different traffic scenarios.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) · Distributed systems and fault tolerance · Real-Time Systems Scheduling
