Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck II: Cross-correlation measurements and cosmological constraints
C. Chang, Y. Omori, E. J. Baxter, C. Doux, A. Choi, S. Pandey, A., Alarcon, O. Alves, A. Amon, F. Andrade-Oliveira, K. Bechtol, M. R. Becker, G., M. Bernstein, F. Bianchini, J. Blazek, L. E. Bleem, H. Camacho, A. Campos, A., Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, R. Cawthon, R. Chen

TL;DR
This paper presents measurements of cross-correlations between galaxy data from DES Year 3 and CMB lensing maps from SPT and Planck, providing new cosmological constraints that are consistent with cosmic shear but lower than Planck CMB results.
Contribution
It introduces a joint analysis of DES Year 3 data with CMB lensing from SPT and Planck, improving cross-correlation measurements and cosmological parameter constraints.
Findings
Cross-correlation signal-to-noise ratio is 23.9 (linear bias) and 25.7 (nonlinear bias).
Constraints on _m and S_8 are obtained, with values consistent with cosmic shear.
Results are lower than Planck primary CMB measurements.
Abstract
Cross-correlations of galaxy positions and galaxy shears with maps of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) are sensitive to the distribution of large-scale structure in the Universe. Such cross-correlations are also expected to be immune to some of the systematic effects that complicate correlation measurements internal to galaxy surveys. We present measurements and modeling of the cross-correlations between galaxy positions and galaxy lensing measured in the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey with CMB lensing maps derived from a combination of data from the 2500 deg SPT-SZ survey conducted with the South Pole Telescope and full-sky data from the Planck satellite. The CMB lensing maps used in this analysis have been constructed in a way that minimizes biases from the thermal Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect, making them well suited for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
