The impossibility of one-way superluminal signaling in the framework of modern Physics

TL;DR

This paper defends the impossibility of one-way superluminal signaling within modern physics, refuting criticisms that rely on unjustified assumptions and highlighting inconsistencies in opposing arguments.

Contribution

It provides a rigorous rebuttal to claims against superluminal signaling, clarifying the theoretical constraints and invalidating previous criticisms.

Findings

No grounds for invariance of superluminal information transfer direction

Reveals inconsistencies in the criticized note

Confirms the impossibility of one-way superluminal signaling

Abstract

This is a response to the note criticizing my paper A New Paradox in Superluminal Signaling. The criticism is based, among other things, on arbitrarily postulated statement about invarience of direction of superluminal information transfer. The analysis presented in my response shows the absence of any grounds for such statement and confirms my original proof of the impossibility of one-way superluminal signaling. The analysis also unveils many other inconsistencies in the discussed note and shows that all its criticism is unsubstantiated. Key words: superluminal signaling, tachyons, the information flow