Robust Text Line Detection in Historical Documents: Learning and Evaluation Methods
M\'elodie Boillet, Christopher Kermorvant, Thierry Paquet

TL;DR
This paper investigates the development of robust, generalizable text line segmentation models for historical documents, emphasizing annotation unification and comprehensive evaluation strategies to improve accuracy across diverse degraded texts.
Contribution
It introduces a unified annotation approach and evaluates three state-of-the-art models, demonstrating improved generalization and segmentation performance on varied historical document datasets.
Findings
Unified annotations enhance segmentation accuracy.
Models trained on diverse datasets generalize well to unseen pages.
Comprehensive evaluation metrics provide better assessment of segmentation quality.
Abstract
Text line segmentation is one of the key steps in historical document understanding. It is challenging due to the variety of fonts, contents, writing styles and the quality of documents that have degraded through the years. In this paper, we address the limitations that currently prevent people from building line segmentation models with a high generalization capacity. We present a study conducted using three state-of-the-art systems Doc-UFCN, dhSegment and ARU-Net and show that it is possible to build generic models trained on a wide variety of historical document datasets that can correctly segment diverse unseen pages. This paper also highlights the importance of the annotations used during training: each existing dataset is annotated differently. We present a unification of the annotations and show its positive impact on the final text recognition results. In this end, we present…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
