Proportional Budget Allocations: Towards a Systematization
Maaike Los, Zo\'e Christoff, Davide Grossi

TL;DR
This paper extends proportionality axioms from multi-winner voting to participatory budgeting, introducing new axioms, analyzing their relationships, and evaluating existing rules against these criteria.
Contribution
It systematically defines new proportionality axioms for participatory budgeting and analyzes their implications, advancing the theoretical framework of fair resource allocation.
Findings
New proportionality axioms for participatory budgeting
Logical relationships among axioms established
Evaluation of Phragmén and Rule X against new criteria
Abstract
We contribute to the programme of lifting proportionality axioms from the multi-winner voting setting to participatory budgeting. We define novel proportionality axioms for participatory budgeting and test them on known proportionality-driven rules such as Phragm\'en and Rule X. We investigate logical implications among old and new axioms and provide a systematic overview of proportionality criteria in participatory budgeting.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems
