Tree Dimension and the Sauer-Shelah Dichotomy
Roland Walker

TL;DR
This paper introduces tree dimension concepts to analyze the complexity of leaf sets in binary and higher-arity trees, providing new bounds and insights into classical combinatorial lemmas like Sauer-Shelah.
Contribution
It defines tree dimension and leveled variants, establishes tight bounds on leaf set sizes, and unifies classical results through a new combinatorial framework.
Findings
Provides tight upper bounds on leaf set sizes using leveled tree dimension
Unifies Sauer-Shelah Lemma and Bhaskar's Littlestone dimension result
Classifies maximal leaf sets by tree dimension and extends to higher-arity trees
Abstract
We introduce tree dimension and its leveled variant in order to measure the complexity of leaf sets in binary trees. We then provide a tight upper bound on the size of such sets using leveled tree dimension. This, in turn, implies both the famous Sauer-Shelah Lemma for VC dimension and Bhaskar's version for Littlestone dimension, giving clearer insight into why these results place the exact same upper bound on their respective shatter functions. We also classify the isomorphism types of maximal leaf sets by tree dimension. Finally, we generalize this analysis to higher-arity trees.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGraph theory and applications · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory · Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
