Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: imprints of cosmic voids and superclusters in the Planck CMB lensing map
A. Kov\'acs, P. Vielzeuf, I. Ferrero, P. Fosalba, U. Demirbozan, R., Miquel, C. Chang, N. Hamaus, G. Pollina, K. Bechtol, M. Becker, A. Carnero, Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, R. Cawthon, M. Crocce, A. Drlica-Wagner, J., Elvin-Poole, M. Gatti, G. Giannini, R.A. Gruendl, A. Porredon

TL;DR
This study detects and analyzes the imprints of cosmic voids and superclusters on the Planck CMB lensing map using DES Year 3 data, revealing a lower-than-expected signal compared to standard cosmological simulations.
Contribution
It provides the first combined analysis of voids and superclusters in DES Y3 data with Planck CMB lensing, highlighting discrepancies with ΛCDM predictions.
Findings
Detected void imprints at 6.6σ significance with lower amplitude than models.
Supercluster imprints detected at 8.4σ, also with reduced amplitude.
Combined void and supercluster signals at 10.3σ, still weaker than expected.
Abstract
The CMB lensing signal from cosmic voids and superclusters probes the growth of structure in the low-redshift cosmic web. In this analysis, we cross-correlated the Planck CMB lensing map with voids detected in the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (Y3) data set (5,000 deg), expanding on previous measurements that used Y1 catalogues (1,300 deg). Given the increased statistical power compared to Y1 data, we report a detection of negative CMB convergence () imprints using approximately 3,600 voids detected from a redMaGiC luminous red galaxy sample. However, the measured signal is lower than expected from the MICE N-body simulation that is based on the CDM model (parameters , ), and the discrepancy is associated mostly with the void centre region. Considering the full void lensing profile, we fit an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
