Comment on "Tests and calibrations of nuclear track detectors (CR39) for operation in high neutron flux" by E.E. Kading et al., Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023279 (2020)
Michael Paul, Ulli K\"oster

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the calibration methods for nuclear track detectors in high neutron flux environments, highlighting flaws that undermine the reliability of previous experimental results and interpretations.
Contribution
It provides a critical commentary identifying flaws in the calibration procedures and questioning the validity of prior experimental conclusions.
Findings
Calibration methods are flawed and unreliable.
Previous results based on these calibrations should be disregarded.
The critique emphasizes the need for improved testing protocols.
Abstract
The conditions of tests and calibrations described in the article E.E Kading et al. [Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023279 (2020)] show striking flaws. The interpretation and extraction of quantitative results from this experiment are considered unreliable. All results of cross sections based on the results described in this article must be disregarded.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNuclear Physics and Applications · Radioactivity and Radon Measurements · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
