TL;DR
This paper introduces a new evaluation method and benchmark for 3D face reconstruction that uses region-wise shape alignment for more precise performance assessment, revealing detailed insights into state-of-the-art methods.
Contribution
It proposes a novel region-wise shape alignment evaluation approach and introduces the REALY benchmark with high-quality data for more accurate 3D face reconstruction assessment.
Findings
DECA excels on nose regions
GANFit performs better on cheek regions
The new evaluation reveals detailed performance differences
Abstract
The evaluation of 3D face reconstruction results typically relies on a rigid shape alignment between the estimated 3D model and the ground-truth scan. We observe that aligning two shapes with different reference points can largely affect the evaluation results. This poses difficulties for precisely diagnosing and improving a 3D face reconstruction method. In this paper, we propose a novel evaluation approach with a new benchmark REALY, consists of 100 globally aligned face scans with accurate facial keypoints, high-quality region masks, and topology-consistent meshes. Our approach performs region-wise shape alignment and leads to more accurate, bidirectional correspondences during computing the shape errors. The fine-grained, region-wise evaluation results provide us detailed understandings about the performance of state-of-the-art 3D face reconstruction methods. For example, our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
