One Bad Apple Can Spoil Your IPv6 Privacy
Said Jawad Saidi, Oliver Gasser, Georgios Smaragdakis

TL;DR
This paper reveals that a single IoT device with a static MAC-encoded IPv6 address can compromise the privacy of entire end-user networks, despite privacy extensions, with significant tracking by third parties.
Contribution
It identifies the privacy risks posed by MAC-encoded IPv6 addresses from IoT devices and highlights the lack of adoption of privacy extensions by major manufacturers.
Findings
19% of end-user privacy is at risk due to IPv6 address issues.
IoT devices are the main contributors to privacy leakage.
Third-party providers can track up to 17% of subscriber lines.
Abstract
IPv6 is being more and more adopted, in part to facilitate the millions of smart devices that have already been installed at home. Unfortunately, we find that the privacy of a substantial fraction of end-users is still at risk, despite the efforts by ISPs and electronic vendors to improve end-user security, e.g., by adopting prefix rotation and IPv6 privacy extensions. By analyzing passive data from a large ISP, we find that around 19% of end-users' privacy can be at risk. When we investigate the root causes, we notice that a single device at home that encodes its MAC address into the IPv6 address can be utilized as a tracking identifier for the entire end-user prefix -- even if other devices use IPv6 privacy extensions. Our results show that IoT devices contribute the most to this privacy leakage and, to a lesser extent, personal computers and mobile devices. To our surprise, some of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
