Velocity-dependent annihilation radiation from dark matter subhalos in cosmological simulations
Erin Piccirillo, Keagan Blanchette, Nassim Bozorgnia, Louis E., Strigari, Carlos S. Frenk, Robert J. J. Grand, Federico Marinacci

TL;DR
This study uses cosmological simulations to analyze how different velocity-dependent dark matter annihilation models affect gamma-ray emission from subhalos and the smooth halo component, highlighting the dominance of the smooth component in most models.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of velocity-dependent dark matter annihilation models in cosmological simulations, emphasizing the varying contributions of subhalos and the smooth halo.
Findings
Sommerfeld model shows subhalo dominance in annihilation flux.
Smooth halo dominates in p-wave and d-wave models.
Extrapolation suggests possible gamma-ray contributions from subhalos in Sommerfeld models.
Abstract
We use the suite of Milky Way-like galaxies in the Auriga simulations to determine the contribution to annihilation radiation from dark matter subhalos in three velocity-dependent dark matter annihilation models: Sommerfeld, p-wave, and d-wave models. We compare these to the corresponding distribution in the velocity-independent s-wave annihilation model. For both the hydrodynamical and dark-matter-only simulations, only in the case of the Sommerfeld-enhanced annihilation does the total annihilation flux from subhalos exceed the total annihilation flux from the smooth halo component within the virial radius of the halo. Progressing from Sommerfeld to the s, p, and d-wave models, the contribution from the smooth component of the halo becomes more dominant, implying that for the p-wave and d-wave models the smooth component is by far the dominant contribution to the radiation. Comparing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
