Common Coil Dipole for High Field Magnet Design and R&D
Ramesh Gupta, Kathleen Amm, Julien Avronsart, Michael Anerella, Anis, Ben Yahia, John Cozzolino, Piyush Joshi, Mithlesh Kumar, Febin Kurian, Chris, Runyan, William Sampson, Jesse Schmalzle, Stephan Kahn, Ronald Scanlan,, Robert Weggel, Erich Willen, Qingjin Xu, Javier Munilla
TL;DR
This paper discusses the advantages of the common coil geometry in high-field magnet design, highlighting its cost-effectiveness, flexibility, and reduced conductor usage at fields of 20 T or more.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the common coil design enables high-field magnets with less conductor, especially HTS, and offers a versatile, cost-effective alternative to traditional designs.
Findings
Common coil design reduces conductor usage at high fields.
It allows a wider range of technologies and rapid R&D.
The design is cost-effective for high-field applications.
Abstract
The common coil geometry provides an alternate design to the conventional cosine theta dipoles. It allows a wider range of conductor and magnet technologies. It also facilitates a low-cost, rapid-turn-around design and R&D program. Recent studies carried out as a part of the US Magnet Development Program revealed that at high fields (20 T with 15% operating margin or more), the common coil design also uses significantly less conductor (particularly much less HTS), as compared to that in the other designs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSuperconducting Materials and Applications · Particle accelerators and beam dynamics · Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies