Hardness for Triangle Problems under Even More Believable Hypotheses: Reductions from Real APSP, Real 3SUM, and OV
Timothy M. Chan, Virginia Vassilevska Williams, Yinzhan Xu

TL;DR
This paper establishes new conditional lower bounds for various graph and string problems based on more realistic hypotheses involving real-valued inputs, strengthening the evidence for their computational hardness.
Contribution
It introduces reductions from Real APSP, Real 3SUM, and OV hypotheses to problems like Triangle Collection and Max Flow, under more believable assumptions.
Findings
Polynomial lower bounds for static and dynamic Max Flow under new hypotheses
Super-linear lower bound for Integer All-Numbers 3SUM based on Real 3SUM
Tight lower bound for string matching problem based on OV hypothesis
Abstract
The SUM hypothesis, the APSP hypothesis and SETH are the three main hypotheses in fine-grained complexity. So far, within the area, the first two hypotheses have mainly been about integer inputs in the Word RAM model of computation. The "Real APSP" and "Real SUM" hypotheses, which assert that the APSP and SUM hypotheses hold for real-valued inputs in a reasonable version of the Real RAM model, are even more believable than their integer counterparts. Under the very believable hypothesis that at least one of the Integer SUM hypothesis, Integer APSP hypothesis or SETH is true, Abboud, Vassilevska W. and Yu [STOC 2015] showed that a problem called Triangle Collection requires time on an -node graph. Our main result is a nontrivial lower bound for a slight generalization of Triangle Collection, called All-Color-Pairs Triangle Collection, under the even more…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
