A Wearables-Driven Attack on Examination Proctoring
Tasnia Ashrafi Heya, Abdul Serwadda, Isaac Griswold-Steiner and, Richard Matovu

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates a novel, highly effective attack on multiple choice exams using wearable sensors and haptic feedback, exposing vulnerabilities in current proctoring methods and advocating for banning all tech gadgets during exams.
Contribution
It introduces a new wearable-based attack protocol on exam integrity, combining experimental validation and theoretical modeling to highlight security flaws.
Findings
The attack is highly effective in bypassing current proctoring measures.
Wearable sensors can be exploited to covertly transmit answers during exams.
Current proctoring methods are insufficient against advanced sensor-based attacks.
Abstract
Multiple choice questions are at the heart of many standardized tests and examinations at academic institutions allover the world. In this paper, we argue that recent advancements in sensing and human-computer interaction expose these types of questions to highly effective attacks that today's proctor's are simply not equipped to detect. We design one such attack based on a protocol of carefully orchestrated wrist movements combined with haptic and visual feedback mechanisms designed for stealthiness. The attack is done through collaboration between a knowledgeable student (i.e., a mercenary) and a weak student (i.e., the beneficiary) who depends on the mercenary for solutions. Through a combination of experiments and theoretical modeling, we show the attack to be highly effective. The paper makes the case for an outright ban on all tech gadgets inside examination rooms, irrespective of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
