Data Smells in Public Datasets
Arumoy Shome, Luis Cruz, Arie van Deursen

TL;DR
This paper introduces a catalog of data smells, analogous to code smells, to identify early signs of data quality issues in public datasets, aiding data scientists in improving data quality for AI applications.
Contribution
It presents the first systematic catalog of data smells and analyzes 25 datasets to assess the prevalence of these quality issues.
Findings
Identified 14 common data smells in public datasets
Analyzed 25 datasets to evaluate data quality issues
Provided a tool for early detection of data problems
Abstract
The adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, wildlife preservation, autonomous driving and criminal justice system calls for a data-centric approach to AI. Data scientists spend the majority of their time studying and wrangling the data, yet tools to aid them with data analysis are lacking. This study identifies the recurrent data quality issues in public datasets. Analogous to code smells, we introduce a novel catalogue of data smells that can be used to indicate early signs of problems or technical debt in machine learning systems. To understand the prevalence of data quality issues in datasets, we analyse 25 public datasets and identify 14 data smells.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
