TL;DR
This paper investigates how group-robust optimization algorithms, originally designed for fairness, can be adapted to handle temporal concept drift in multi-label document classification, showing they outperform traditional resampling methods especially for minority classes.
Contribution
It rethinks group-robust algorithms as adaptation methods for concept drift, demonstrating their effectiveness over sampling-based approaches in multi-label classification with many classes.
Findings
Invariant Risk Minimization outperforms resampling methods.
Spectral Decoupling improves minority class performance.
Effectiveness increases with larger label sets.
Abstract
In document classification for, e.g., legal and biomedical text, we often deal with hundreds of classes, including very infrequent ones, as well as temporal concept drift caused by the influence of real world events, e.g., policy changes, conflicts, or pandemics. Class imbalance and drift can sometimes be mitigated by resampling the training data to simulate (or compensate for) a known target distribution, but what if the target distribution is determined by unknown future events? Instead of simply resampling uniformly to hedge our bets, we focus on the underlying optimization algorithms used to train such document classifiers and evaluate several group-robust optimization algorithms, initially proposed to mitigate group-level disparities. Reframing group-robust algorithms as adaptation algorithms under concept drift, we find that Invariant Risk Minimization and Spectral Decoupling…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
