Giant Chern number of a Weyl nodal surface without upper limit
Junzhang Ma, S.-N. Zhang, J. P. Song, Q.-S. Wu, S. A. Ekahana, M., Naamneh, M. Radovic, V. N. Strocov, S.-Y. Gao, T. Qian, H. Ding, K. He, K., Manna, C. Felser, N. C. Plumb, O. V. Yazyev, Y.-M. Xiong, M. Shi

TL;DR
This paper reports the discovery of a giant Chern number of 26 in a Weyl nodal surface in AlPt, demonstrating that there is no upper limit to the Chern numbers of such 2D Weyl objects.
Contribution
It reveals a cube-shaped Weyl nodal surface with an unprecedented Chern number, enforced by nonsymmorphic symmetries, challenging previous assumptions of an upper limit.
Findings
The Weyl nodal surface in AlPt has a Chern number of 26.
The nodal surface is enforced by nonsymmorphic symmetries and time reversal symmetry.
No upper limit exists for the Chern numbers of 2D Weyl nodal objects.
Abstract
Weyl nodes can be classified into zero-dimensional (0D) Weyl points (WPs), 1D Weyl nodal lines (WNL) and 2D Weyl nodal surfaces (WNS), which possess finite Chern numbers. Up to date, the largest Chern number of WPs identified in Weyl semimetals is 4, which is thought to be a maximal value for linearly crossing points in solids. On the other hand, whether the Chern numbers of nonzero-dimensional linear crossing Weyl nodal objects have one upper limit is still an open question. In this work, combining angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy with density functional theory calculations, we show that the chiral crystal AlPt hosts a cube-shaped charged Weyl nodal surface which is formed by the linear crossings of two singly-degenerate bands. Different to conventional Weyl nodes, the cube-shaped nodal surface in AlPt is enforced by nonsymmorphic chiral symmetries and time reversal symmetry…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
