Some more results on relativized Chaitin's $\Omega$
Liang Yu

TL;DR
This paper investigates the properties of relativized Chaitin's Omega within set theory, showing non-injectivity and degree invariance issues, and explores the complexity of functions mapping to random reals under certain axioms.
Contribution
It proves non-injectivity and degree invariance failure of relativized Omega under ZF, and characterizes functions to random reals under ZF+AD.
Findings
Relativized Omega is not injective on pointed sets under ZF.
Omega fails to be degree invariant in a strong sense.
Functions to x-random reals are uncountable-to-one over an upper Turing cone.
Abstract
We prove that, assuming , and restricted to any pointed set, Chaitin's is not injective for any universal prefix-free Turing machine , and that fails to be degree invariant in a very strong sense, answering several recent questions in descriptive set theory. Moreover, we show that under , every function mapping to -random must be uncountable-to-one over an upper cone of Turing degrees.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Cellular Automata and Applications
