Revisiting Kepler Transiting Systems: Unvetting Planets and Constraining Relationships among Harmonics in Phase Curves
Prajwal Niraula, Avi Shporer, Ian Wong, and Julien de Wit

TL;DR
This study refutes the planetary status of four Kepler candidates using updated stellar data and phase-curve analysis, and explores harmonic relationships in binary star systems to understand tidal interactions.
Contribution
It demonstrates the importance of updated stellar parameters in vetting exoplanet candidates and establishes a power-law relation among phase-curve harmonics in binary systems.
Findings
Four candidate planets are reclassified as non-planetary based on physical radii and mass analysis.
A strong power-law relation exists between the second harmonic and higher harmonics in phase curves.
The ratio of harmonic amplitudes aligns with classical tidal distortion models.
Abstract
Space-based photometric missions widely use statistical validation tools for vetting transiting planetary candidates, particularly when other traditional methods of planet confirmation are unviable. In this paper, we refute the planetary nature of three previously validated planets -- Kepler-854~b, Kepler-840~b, and Kepler-699~b -- and possibly a fourth, Kepler-747~b, using updated stellar parameters from Gaia and phase-curve analysis. In all four cases, the inferred physical radii rule out their planetary nature given the stellar radiation the companions receive. For Kepler-854~b, the mass derived from the host star's ellipsoidal variation, which had not been part of the original vetting procedure, similarly points to a non-planetary value. To contextualize our understanding of the phase curve for stellar mass companions in particular and extend our understanding of high-order…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
