On Cyclic Solutions to the Min-Max Latency Multi-Robot Patrolling Problem

TL;DR

This paper studies cyclic patrol schedules for multiple robots in a metric space, providing approximation algorithms and bounds that relate cyclic solutions to the optimal, with implications for Euclidean spaces.

Contribution

It introduces a reduction for approximating cyclic solutions and proves that cyclic solutions approximate the optimal within a factor of 2(1-1/k).

Findings

Approximation of cyclic solutions reduces to TSP approximation with small loss.

Optimal cyclic solutions are a 2(1-1/k)-approximation of the overall optimum.

In Euclidean spaces, the results imply a PTAS for cyclic solutions and near-optimality for unrestricted solutions.

Abstract

We consider the following surveillance problem: Given a set $P$ of $n$ sites in a metric space and a set of $k$ robots with the same maximum speed, compute a patrol schedule of minimum latency for the robots. Here a patrol schedule specifies for each robot an infinite sequence of sites to visit (in the given order) and the latency $L$ of a schedule is the maximum latency of any site, where the latency of a site $s$ is the supremum of the lengths of the time intervals between consecutive visits to $s$. When $k=1$ the problem is equivalent to the travelling salesman problem (TSP) and thus it is NP-hard. We have two main results. We consider cyclic solutions in which the set of sites must be partitioned into $\ell$ groups, for some~$\ell \leq k$, and each group is assigned a subset of the robots that move along the travelling salesman tour of the group at equal distance from each other. Our first main result is that approximating the optimal latency of the class of cyclic solutions can be reduced to approximating the optimal travelling salesman tour on some input, with only a $1+\varepsilon$ factor loss in the approximation factor and an $O\left(\left( k/\varepsilon \right)^k\right)$ factor loss in the runtime, for any $\varepsilon >0$. Our second main result shows that an optimal cyclic solution is a $2(1-1/k)$-approximation of the overall optimal solution. Note that for $k=2$ this implies that an optimal cyclic solution is optimal overall. The results have a number of consequences. For the Euclidean version of the problem, for instance, combining our results with known results on Euclidean TSP, yields a PTAS for approximating an optimal cyclic solution, and it yields a $(2(1-1/k)+\varepsilon)$-approximation of the optimal unrestricted solution. If the conjecture mentioned above is true, then our algorithm is actually a PTAS for the general problem in the Euclidean setting.